TAIWAN HRJ
 

看見「隱形的受害人」:從《兒童權 利公約》評洪當興家暴殺人案刑事裁判中的被告子女權益論述與量刑考量

作者:林慈偉(台灣廢除死刑推動聯盟法務主任;國立政治大學法學博士)

摘要:

本文從《兒童權利公約》檢視洪當興家暴殺人案歷審裁判後發現,該案審理前、後期對於兒童最佳利益的考慮與衡量有極大落差。該案於第一、二審即審理前期,就被告子女兒童利益之未予重視並持續判死,直至經最高法院發回後的更一審階段出現了重大突破。更一審法院除了以程序書面裁定本件送請兒童最佳利益鑑定並詳述理由、確立執行原則外,在最終的實體判決量刑理由中,亦詳細檢核本件在可能選科死刑的情況下,是如何於被告的量刑評價之中,衡酌被告子女之兒童最佳利益。洪案更一審裁判,於論述上盡可能地以合於《兒童權利公約》的解釋方式在量刑中考慮兒童最佳利益、意識到科處死刑之特殊性,實踐上亦為成人刑案中委託兒童最佳利益鑑定的裁判首例,當屬標竿裁判。惟本文從學理角度指出,現行裁判實務包含洪案更一審判決在內,將兒童最佳利益解釋為刑法第57條量刑因子之一的見解仍過於狹隘,有未能意識到刑罰對於整體社會更為廣泛的影響、以及非基於被告子女主體視角出發的量刑考慮等不足之處,同時本文也提出相關建議,期盼裁判實務未來就類似案件之《兒童權利公約》議題,都能夠更深入理解、認真以對,看見這群「隱形的受害人」。
 
關鍵字
《兒童權利公約》、死刑、兒童最佳利益、量刑、被告子女
 

 

 


Seeing the “Invisible Victims”: Examining the Defendant's Children's Rights Discourse and Sentencing Consideration in the Criminal Trial of Hong Dangxing's Family Violence Homicide Case under the Convention on the Rights of the Child

Author:Tzu-Wei Lin (Legal Director, Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP); Doctor of Judicial Science, National Chengchi University)

Abstract:

This paper examines the significant disparity in the consideration and evaluation of the best interests of the children involved in the Hong Dangxing family violence homicide case throughout its judicial proceedings, as seen through the lens of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The case showed a substantial shift in the consideration of the children's best interests from the early stages to the later stages of the trial. In the first and second trials, the best interests of the defendant's children were not adequately considered, resulting in a death penalty verdict. However, a breakthrough occurred in the subsequent retrial after the Supreme Court's remand.
 
During the retrial, the court not only ordered an assessment of the child's best interests, providing detailed reasons and establishing principles for execution, but also conducted a comprehensive examination of how the best interests of the defendant's children were considered in the sentencing evaluation, even in cases where the death penalty was a possible outcome. The sentencing rationale in the retrial of the Hong case made every effort to consider the best interests of the children in line with the interpretation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, acknowledging the uniqueness of imposing the death penalty. Moreover, this retrial set a precedent for adult criminal cases involving an assessment of a child's best interests. It can be considered a landmark decision.
 
However, from a theoretical perspective, this paper points out that current judicial practice, including that observed in the retrial of the Hong case, interpret the best interests of the child as merely one of the factors under Article 57 of the Penal Code. This interpretation is seen as rather narrow as it neglects to acknowledge the broader societal impact of punishments and fails to takes into account during the sentencing process the perspective of the defendant's children as individual subjects. The paper also provides relevant recommendations, hoping that future judicial practice will better understand and seriously address issues related to the Convention on the Rights of the Child in cases similar to this one, recognizing the presence of these “invisible victims”.
 
Keywords
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Death Penalty, Best Interests of the Child, Sentencing, Children of the Defendant
 

 

全文下載

最新消息
最新內容
 
中國民主運動研究|專訪東吳大學政治學系王興中兼任助理教授|人權群像第三季第七集(下)
 
中國民主運動研究|專訪東吳大學政治學系王興中兼任助理教授|人權群像第三季第七集(上)
 
Professor Kar-Yen Leong’s Witness on Southeast Asia: Part 2|專訪淡江大學全球政治經濟學系梁家恩副教授|人權群像第三季第三集|黃于哲
 
看見東南亞移工|專訪燦爛時光東南亞主題書店張正負責人|人權群像第三季第六集
 
Professor Kar-Yen Leong’s Witness on Southeast Asia: Part 1|專訪淡江大學全球政治經濟學系梁家恩副教授|人權群像第三季第二集|黃于哲
 
Professor Yu-Jie Chen’s Multifaceted Career: Researcher, Teacher, and Activist|Professor Yu-Jie Chen|人權群像第三季第一集|黃于哲
 
Professor Seymour’s Reminiscence on Taiwan|James Dulles Seymour|人權群像第二季第七集|黃于哲
 
推動台灣廢死最前線|專訪林欣怡執行長|人權群像第二季第六集
 
台權會十年回顧|專訪台權人權促進會副秘書長施逸翔|人權群像第二季第五集
 
台灣人權教育現場|專訪湯梅英教授|人權群像第二季第四集
 
學生權益與教師人權培育|林佳範|人權群像第二季第三集
 
從友善校園到人權教育|專訪王秀津老師|人權群像第二季第二集
 
從國際公約談人權議題及價值|專訪黃嵩立教授|人權群像第二季第一集
 
學術研究與公共服務|專訪廖福特||人權群像第一季第八集
 
理論與實踐的辯證|專訪顧玉玲|人權群像第一季第七集
 
海外人權運動四十年|專訪王渝||人權群像第一季第六集
 
憲法與國際人權法的匯流|專訪張文貞教授|人權群像第一季第五集
 
台灣與國際人權標準|專訪陳玉潔||人權群像第一季第四集
 
台灣的國家人權委員會應該設置在哪裡?|專訪魏千峯||人權群像第一季第三集
 
台灣的國家人權委員會應該設置在哪裡?|專訪李念祖|人權群像第一季第二集
 
她(他)們還是我們?|專訪陳文葳||人權群像第一季第一集